The Charitable Purpose of Legal Advocates for Abused Women

Further, to accept these Defendants’ arguments as true, the Court must necessarily also accept that:

1.      Defendant Timothy Straussner is a woman;

2.      To publish the words of Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. constitutes a “crime of violence” pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 16;

3.      Although were Plaintiff to launch an Atlas V missile from Milwaukee, Wisconsin directly at Salois in St. Louis, Missouri, and she would still have time to seek shelter or otherwise avoid such missile strike, that Plaintiff battered Salois in her person from such a distance;

4.      The illegal song is a “crime of violence” pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 16, constituting a “true threat” pursuant to Virginia v. Black, 538 U.S. 343, 359-60 (2003), on the grounds that pop/punk might cause Salois to harm herself or her children, when in fact the reading of any Bible verse or a paragraph from The Catcher in the Rye might well incline Salois to such acts; although it remains undetermined as to which Bible verses are illegal in the State of Missouri, as well as the extent this proposed “Catcher in the Rye defense” will revolutionize the work of criminal defense attorneys in that state;

5.      To provide disguises to persons committing assault and battery for the purpose of forwarding a claim of mistaken identity in a court of law constitutes a “charitable purpose” under the Second Restatement of Trusts;

6.      To corruptly influence the due course of justice in a pending federal judicial proceeding constitutes a “charitable purpose” under the Second Restatement of Trusts;

7.      Although Defendants substantiate each element of a claim for six racketeering counts in their Motion, they are nonetheless without liability in their participation in the operation and management of a multi-state racketeering enterprise; and

8.      Numerous other such nonsensical assertions which boggle the mind in their stupidity.